.....I hate how "pilgrimage" is forced on every walker.
I concur absolutely. I think that the Camino has gained in popularity because of the increased secularity. I really wonder how many walk it simply because
- it is a historic trail in a remote region we would otherwise hardly consider to visit, but which offers to long-distance hikers a unique and low-cost infrastructure, hospitality and a mostly moderate climate.
- it is a long journey with moderate difficulty suitable to all ages and a determined destination.
- it is helps focusing on one's innermost self with distance and physical exercise and by removing distraction.
The CF is a perfect combination of being segregate from our everyday life without being desolate; frugal, yet with every amenity and security; exotic by people, language, custom and foods, yet familiar by culture.
While this culture has pre-Christian roots, it is undeniably and deeply interwoven with religion and faith. For many, the Camino is a truly religious exercise in its most traditional way but I felt myself in good and plentiful company with those who choose to walk it "only" for a strictly personal, secular or even a mere physical purpose of enrichment.
Neither do I see a contradiction for a mundane "non-believer" to attend a pilgrim mass at the cathedral in SdC as a culmination of achieving his goal, gratefully accepting the hospitality of church without being part of it.
I perceived the Camino as an exercise of "truly Christian" tolerance awarded to all and every participant regardless of his/her motivation and believes, a truly earthly experience. So, finally I do not feel the description "Pilgrim" being forced on me but rather accept it as a universal badge of honour.