Sureste and Levante

[murraydv]

Here is a very good chart that clearly shows where the Camino Sureste from Alacante and Camino Levante from Valencia coinside and differ. Obviously, they differ significantly at the beginning before joining in Chinchilla del Montearagón. Then they split and join several times until they split significantly again at Medina del Campo with Levante going to Zamora and Suresta going to Benavente. Both can they join either the Camino Sanabres or the Camino Francés. The Via de la Plata is also shown on the chart. Dave.

 

[peregrina2000]

This is fabulous. Years ago when I walked the Levante, the two associations were essentially “warring.” It was very confusing for pilgrims. It looks like the two groups have gotten together to provide clear info —I think it will benefit both Caminos a lot. Makes me much more tempted to go back and walk the Sureste!

 

[LTfit]

Too bad that they didn't add the Lana to the map as it too starts in Alicante and has a few stages that coincide.

 

[p_mci]

Thanks for this!

 

[lovetoread3]

This is a great chart, thank you very much

 

[Donaldclive]

What if you "mix and match" - e.g. sometimes taking the blue (Sureste) lines in the map above and at other times the green (Levante) lines? What determines which Camino you declare? Would that depend on where you started: Valencia or Alicante? Your thoughts would be appreciated.

Don.

 

[MikeJS]

What if you "mix and match" - e.g. sometimes taking the blue (Sureste) lines in the map above and at other times the green (Levante) lines? What determines which Camino you declare? Would that depend on where you started: Valencia or Alicante? Your thoughts would be appreciated.

Don.

Don’t think it matter one way or another. When I walked the Sureste a couple of years ago I then continued on the Frances and then onto the Invierno. The pilgrim office were very confused and just asked me how far it was!

 

[murraydv]

What if you "mix and match" - e.g. sometimes taking the blue (Sureste) lines in the map above and at other times the green (Levante) lines? What determines which Camino you declare? Would that depend on where you started: Valencia or Alicante? Your thoughts would be appreciated.

Don.

Good question Don. I thought of that myself. Can’t give you a definite answer but I would fully agree that the starting point would appear to determine that, together with your short interview in SdeC as they are filling out your Compostela.

 

[peregrina2000]

Good question Don. I thought of that myself. Can’t give you a definite answer but I would fully agree that the starting point would appear to determine that, together with your short interview in SdeC as they are filling out your Compostela.

This matters more for statistical compilation than for you personally. For the compostela, they don’t need your starting point, they just give you the compostela if you declare a spiritual or religious purpose and if you have walked at least the last100 km from Santiago with no motorized transport. If you want a distance certificate, you should arrive with the info you want it to show — starting point, caminos walked, total kms.

But when it comes to the office’s records of “who walks which caminos” it gets more complicated, for them anyway. I think the Invierno is “victim” to this a lot, because many Invierno pilgrims start on another camino and then move over to the Invierno in Ponferrada. And so they never show up as Invierno pilgrims.

 

[Donaldclive]

Thank you, MikeJS, Murraydv and Peregrina2000. Yes, they were a little bemused at the Pilgrim Office when I showed them my credencial in 2017 showing Seville to Salamanca, then transferring to the Portuguese at Coimbra and then on to Santiago.

 

[ranthr]

I waited for 3 hour to be signed up as a number of the Invierno statistics, but I do not think I was, since the start was in Ponferrada and the man in the office did not understand English or my trying to speek Spanish. So next time I ˜ll spend my time on something more interresting than trying to get my n´te compostela

 

[JLWV]

This edition includes a way from Talavera la Reina.
(Talavera is also in the Caminos a Guadalupe)

 

[Bad Pilgrim]

View attachment 67009
This edition includes a way from Talavera la Reina.
(Talavera is also in the Caminos a Guadalupe)

Neat! It looks like the Camino Subway system!

 

[Kiwi-family]

Just as a matter of interest, how well are the different options signalled on the ground (as it were)? I will be walking with a route on maps.me to zoom in on and the guides reminding me where to be careful, but I’m interested to know how easy it would be to take the wrong way.

 

[peregrina2000]

But the Lana is still missing!

 

[OzAnnie]

But the Lana is still missing!

But what an inspiring map ! I see the addition isn’t yet included either; of the way from Zamora (south of the Sanabrés) Via the corner of Portugal, to Ourense ?
(Camino Zamorano Portugues).

Buen Camino /( bom caminho).
Annie

 

[george.g]

 

[george.g]

Hi Kiwi-family, I walked a mix of the Sureste and Levant in '14 and where the routes crossed there was usually a marker as in the photo, be aware there can be any number of routes sharing the same path, I remember one occasion somewhere near El Toboso where there were markers for :- Sureste, Levante, Camino Hannibal and Route Don Quixote on the same post!
Regards
George

 

[JLWV]

Just as a matter of interest, how well are the different options signalled on the ground (as it were)? I will be walking with a route on maps.me to zoom in on and the guides reminding me where to be careful, but I’m interested to know how easy it would be to take the wrong way.

George.g give one of various examples, but in some ocasión those signs may fail.
If you check the description of the Levante on the web www.vieiragrino.com you will have an indication ( for example: *(Attention variant Southeast Way by Villanueva de Bogas street).) where is the point of bifurcation, and a waypoint has been added in the tracks of this web

But the Lana is still missing!

True, this Metro like map was initially intended to clarify the differences between Levante and Sureste. For a complete sight of formal ways the best information is the map of the IGN.

 

[Deleted member 73526]

But the Lana is still missing!

The omissions are striking. It also erases the Camino Mozarabe in favor of some very eccentric routes from Almeria and Granada. The suggested route from Granada is labeled "Camino de San Juan de la Cruz," but that's actually not true. The Camino with that name is a short route near Murcia.

Camino de San Juan de la Cruz

CAMINO DE SAN JUAN DE LA CRUZUn camino hacia el interior

caminodesanjuandelacruz.org

My take is that this is a map with a message. And while I don't mind graphics and diagrams with promotional intent, I feel that there's a line that separates biased communications from dishonest communications. This map falls on the wrong side of that line.