For 2024 Pilgrims: €50,- donation = 1 year with no ads on the forum + 90% off any 2024 Guide. More here. (Discount code sent to you by Private Message after your donation) |
---|
Why would you search for Camino Frances elevation/profile info if you are going to walk Caminho Portugues???Thanks to everyone for their responses. I am planning on walking the Camino Portugues next year and am starting to plan my training for the walk. I used the height measurement to get an average height gain per week to give me a number to train to for a while (I know they are different trails). I expect to walk more than 1000 training miles before I start the Camino. I can do this because I am retired. ;-)
Thanks to everyone for their responses. I am planning on walking the Camino Portugues next year and am starting to plan my training for the walk. I used the height measurement to get an average height gain per week to give me a number to train to for a while (I know they are different trails). I expect to walk more than 1000 training miles before I start the Camino. I can do this because I am retired. ;-)
Wait, if you end up with a net elevation gain between SJPP and Finisterre at the ocean, does that mean SJPP is at an altitude below sea level?
Except that the first link, which the OP said provided exactly what was required said:I think they were talking about total/cumulative rather than net elevation gainSt Jean sits around 180m above sea level (varies a bit with all its ups and downs). But I'm enjoying the image of a below-sea-level version of the place!
The finish point might be SdC (above sea level) but something still looks off.Except that the first link, which the OP said provided exactly what was required said:
That seems to work out to a net elevation gain, implying that the elevation at the end, on the shores of the Atlantic, is higher than the elevation in SJPP.
- Elevation Gain: 18,666 meters (61,240 feet)
- Elevation Loss: 17,778 meters (58,328 feet)
Except that the first link, which the OP said provided exactly what was required said:
That seems to work out to a net elevation gain, implying that the elevation at the end, on the shores of the Atlantic, is higher than the elevation in SJPP.
- Elevation Gain: 18,666 meters (61,240 feet)
- Elevation Loss: 17,778 meters (58,328 feet)
Does anyone know the total elevation gain and loss on the Norte?
I just did a quick check on wikiloc.com and saw a few tracks listed at over 400 miles. The elevation gain for these were about 45,000 feet (which Google says is 13,716 meters).Does anyone know the total elevation gain and loss on the Norte?
Thank you!I just did a quick check on wikiloc.com and saw a few tracks listed at over 400 miles. The elevation gain for these were about 45,000 feet (which Google says is 13,716 meters).
One of the longer tracks said it was a coastal variant and the gain was almost 50,000 feet.
Does anyone know the total elevation gain and loss on the Norte?
Did you do the math based on Gronze figures, or is there a link to the total elevation gain/loss?Gain: 20923 m
Loss: 20692 m
Irun to Santiago
Source: Gronze
edit: Just goes to show how misleading feelings can be. I did Norte in 2017 and Primitivo in 2019 and thought Primitivo was much harder. The Primitivo's cumulative gain/loss is 43 m/km. Norte's is 48.
Did you do the math based on Gronze figures, or is there a link to the total elevation gain/loss?
I don't doubt you, I just want to see all the numbers.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?