- Time of past OR future Camino
- frances
A donation to the forum removes ads for you, and supports Ivar in his work running it |
---|
possibly still there because it is impractical and uneconomic to remove them... and ploughing machinery can be hard-surfaced to better deal with abrasive soils.Walking along the CF I see so many of the farming fields are full of rocks. It seems to me they would be pretty tough on the equipment so I wonder if there is a good reason for leaving them in the fields.
where was the picture taken, puttster?Walking along the CF I see so many of the farming fields are full of rocks. It seems to me they would be pretty tough on the equipment so I wonder if there is a good reason for leaving them in the fields.
I agree with all, except the last sentence. Turning over largish stones in my field this morning, the soil underneath was definitely damper than that to the side. How labour intensive it would be to remove those in the picture and next year, more would be ploughed up.This is a job for an agriculturist. To improve soil like this, it can take generations. The only way to do it is to either remove the stones and /or add soil. To add soil, there has to be a place where top soil is not required, then move and spread it. The other option is to introduce plant matter, roll it in and allow it to compost, add to the soil that is there. This is one reason why fields will lay fallow, (unplanted with harvestable produce), for up to several years, so, when tilled again, all plant life is worked into the soil to add to its volume as well as increase nutrients. Adding manure and all other fertilizers is a given. Removing stones can be done by machinery but is specialized and expensive.
Mention was made that moisture may be retained under stones. Well, stones heat up, being solid, much faster than soil, so, any soil will dry out faster because of the rocks and stones.
I agree with all, except the last sentence. Turning over largish stones in my field this morning, the soil underneath was definitely damper than that to the side. How labour intensive it would be to remove those in the picture and next year, more would be ploughed up.
It's believed rocks can add trace minerals to the soil which affect the terroir and the ultimate flavor of wines produced. Some of the best wines come from rocky soil.Wine from rocks?
Monastrell / Mourvèdre vines typical of arid areas is eastern Spain eg Jumilla.
Image from Winetraveler
Winetraveler • Wine Vacation Itineraries & Insider Travel Tips
View attachment 129946
Yes, large, deep stone will maintain some moisture, not like in the Author supplied photo, purely due to their depth, inability of the Sun to heat the stone to that depth, but large stones are plow breakers and crops would work harder to find that moisture deeper down.I agree with all, except the last sentence. Turning over largish stones in my field this morning, the soil underneath was definitely damper than that to the side. How labour intensive it would be to remove those in the picture and next year, more would be ploughed up.
Yes, large, deep stone will maintain some moisture, not like in the Author supplied photo, purely due to their depth, inability of the Sun to heat the stone to that depth, but large stones are plow breakers and crops would work harder to find that moisture deeper dow