For 2024 Pilgrims: €50,- donation = 1 year with no ads on the forum + 90% off any 2024 Guide. More here. (Discount code sent to you by Private Message after your donation) |
---|
Osprey Exos 48L | Rab Aeon Ultra 28L | |
Capacity | 48 Liters | 28 Liters |
Weight (oz/grams) | 46/1315 | 25/710 |
Dimensions (inches/cm) | 31.5H x 14.17W x 11.8D 80H x 36W x 30D | 21.3H x 13.4 W x 12.2D 54H x 34W x 31D |
Last Sep/Oct I walked the CF with a Gossamer Gear G4-20 42L Ultralight Pack and would recommend it. Using all ultralight gear my daily pack weight including water was 7.5kgGreetings,
I have done the Camino twice (French Way) and used my trusty Osprey Exos 48. It has served me well.
I'm doing the French Way again in a few weeks, and I have decided to go ultra-lightweight and found a great new pack that doesn't get any buzz on this forum.
Now, don't get me wrong, my trusty Osprey Exos 48 has been a reliable partner, no doubt. But this Rab Aeon Ultra 28L? It blows the competition away when it comes to shedding those extra ounces/grams.
View attachment 147359View attachment 147360
MORE details here: LINKY
The Rab Aeon Ultra 28L weighs just 25 ounces (710g)! Here is a quick comparison:
Osprey Exos 48L Rab Aeon Ultra 28L Capacity 48 Liters 28 Liters Weight (oz/grams) 46/1315 25/710 Dimensions (inches/cm) 31.5H x 14.17W x 11.8D
80H x 36W x 30D21.3H x 13.4 W x 12.2D
54H x 34W x 31D
I have done about 10 practice hikes with the Rab (up to 15 miles/25km), and here are my observations:
Rab is based in the UK, and very few stores in the US have Rab packs. I think they are more available in Europe.
- POSITIVES:
- Really lightweight!
- Decent hip belt (given the weight of the pack)
- I love all the pockets on the shoulder straps (4 total) Very handy for phones, small cameras, snacks...
- There are 2 nice hip-belt pockets that are stretchy and functional
- Very large and very functional side water bottle pockets that are actually easy to use and reach!
- A very large and stretchy outside back pocket (great for raingear, food...)
- Very good comfort with 17 pounds/7.7kg (which is my dry pack weight)
- Waterproof (and all the seams have been taped)
- Meets carry-on regulation size, so I will not need to check my backpack! NOTE: My pack fully loaded is just under 9" deep/22.9cm, so it meets the regulations.
- NEGATIVES:
- It is only 28 liters. It's tight, but I can get all my stuff in the pack.
- Durability? It is made from lightweight materials, but I think it should hold up.
- Ventilation is not as good as my Osprey (who have the best), but still very good.
- Not as comfortable as my Osprey, but still very good.
Might want to check out the pack for your next Camino.
I will do a full report when I return.
Hope you find this helpful!!!!
Cheers,
It's great that you think this is (almost) perfect, or have a skill in writing headlines, but I'm not inclined to think this would be on my list of packs to consider anytime soon.Might want to check out the pack for your next Camino.
The company selling it has a list price of 155 Euros.No mention made of how much these packs cost.
For a few of us, the price tag is a big consideration, and it usually eliminates the ultralite option from the start.
I don't see it that way at all. Posting about any piece of equipment may bring awareness of a brand or style that is unknown to some members which may end up being their perfect backpack, shoes, etc.Promoting particular products, as you have done here, runs the risk of being seen as trying to influence members towards a particular solution
This is what I found out as well. I recently bought an Osprey Kyte 36, which is a bigger, heavier pack than I had before. But it fits so well on my back and it is so much more comfortable to carry that I actually don't notice the extra weight.I have used lightweight packs from other makers, and always found them highly compromised. In particular, they remove so much padding from the harness that their comfortable load carrying limits are significantly reduced compared to more traditional designs of similar volumes.
That's true at normal conditions of temperature and pressure. In order to ligthen it I always boil water before packing it !Remember also that water weighs 1 kg per litre.
This was also on my shortlist. How did it hold up for you???Last Sep/Oct I walked the CF with a Gossamer Gear G4-20 42L Ultralight Pack and would recommend it. Using all ultralight gear my daily pack weight including water was 7.5kg
I got mine off of FleeBay for $130 (new)No mention made of how much these packs cost.
For a few of us, the price tag is a big consideration, and it usually eliminates the ultralite option from the start.
Seems like way too much work to me, but I am pretty lazy by nature.In my previous message, I mentioned that fitting everything into my 28L pack was a bit challenging. However, I'm happy to say that I managed to solve the problem and even have some room to spare!
I utilized the "Ranger Roll" technique to fold and repack my clothes, and the results were astounding. I was amazed at how much space I was able to recover using this method. It seems like I gained an additional 10-15% of space! Now, I'm no longer worried about fitting everything in.
To be honest, I have seen/known about the Ranger Roll method for years, but was skeptical that it really saved space... boy was I wrong! (YMMV
YEAH... I was thinking the same thing.Seems like way too much work to me, but I am pretty lazy by nature.
Any two compartment packs you can suggest? I’ve used my Osprey Exos 48 for 2,400 miles amd love it. The single compartment is my only complaint. My Osprey will need replacement in the not too distant future. I don’t like the current version and so would appreciate any suggestions. I promise not to take them as promoting a particular product! Thanks.Promoting particular products, as you have done here, runs the risk of being seen as trying to influence members towards a particular solution. Perhaps your views on this will be more valuable once you have used it on the camino and have a better appreciation of how well it actually performs in that environment.
Hi, are you working for this company?Greetings,
I have done the Camino twice (French Way) and used my trusty Osprey Exos 48. It has served me well.
I'm doing the French Way again in a few weeks, and I have decided to go ultra-lightweight and found a great new pack that doesn't get any buzz on this forum.
Now, don't get me wrong, my trusty Osprey Exos 48 has been a reliable partner, no doubt. But this Rab Aeon Ultra 28L? It blows the competition away when it comes to shedding those extra ounces/grams.
View attachment 147359View attachment 147360
MORE details here: LINKY
The Rab Aeon Ultra 28L weighs just 25 ounces (710g)! Here is a quick comparison:
Osprey Exos 48L Rab Aeon Ultra 28L Capacity 48 Liters 28 Liters Weight (oz/grams) 46/1315 25/710 Dimensions (inches/cm) 31.5H x 14.17W x 11.8D
80H x 36W x 30D21.3H x 13.4 W x 12.2D
54H x 34W x 31D
I have done about 10 practice hikes with the Rab (up to 15 miles/25km), and here are my observations:
Rab is based in the UK, and very few stores in the US have Rab packs. I think they are more available in Europe.
- POSITIVES:
- Really lightweight!
- Decent hip belt (given the weight of the pack)
- I love all the pockets on the shoulder straps (4 total) Very handy for phones, small cameras, snacks...
- There are 2 nice hip-belt pockets that are stretchy and functional
- Very large and very functional side water bottle pockets that are actually easy to use and reach!
- A very large and stretchy outside back pocket (great for raingear, food...)
- Very good comfort with 17 pounds/7.7kg (which is my dry pack weight)
- Waterproof (and all the seams have been taped)
- Meets carry-on regulation size, so I will not need to check my backpack! NOTE: My pack fully loaded is just under 9" deep/22.9cm, so it meets the regulations.
- NEGATIVES:
- It is only 28 liters. It's tight, but I can get all my stuff in the pack.
- Durability? It is made from lightweight materials, but I think it should hold up.
- Ventilation is not as good as my Osprey (who have the best), but still very good.
- Not as comfortable as my Osprey, but still very good.
Might want to check out the pack for your next Camino.
I will do a full report when I return.
Hope you find this helpful!!!!
Cheers,
I have used two compartment packs from Osprey, Deuter and Kathmandu on different pilgrimage routes. My favourite camino pack is a now quite old Deuter Guide 45+. It is a bit heavy by modern standards for a straightforward hiking pack, and if I were in the market for something around that size again, I wouldn't be looking for features like rope holders and other attachment straps and clips which are not always useful on the Camino. The stripped down Osprey packs, designated LT, look like good options to consider.Any two compartment packs you can suggest? I’ve used my Osprey Exos 48 for 2,400 miles amd love it. The single compartment is my only complaint. My Osprey will need replacement in the not too distant future. I don’t like the current version and so would appreciate any suggestions. I promise not to take them as promoting a particular product! Thanks.
Thanks, Dougfitz. I’ll check out some of the other Ospreys. I’ve really liked my Exos but the current model has no belt or strap pockets like my older one. I’d miss them.I have used two compartment packs from Osprey, Deuter and Kathmandu on different pilgrimage routes. My favourite camino pack is a now quite old Deuter Guide 45+. It is a bit heavy by modern standards for a straightforward hiking pack, and if I were in the market for something around that size again, I wouldn't be looking for features like rope holders and other attachment straps and clips which are not always useful on the Camino. The stripped down Osprey packs, designated LT, look like good options to consider.
That being said, this year I walked with my wife's Aarn Natural Exhilaration. This has a single main bag of about 37 li, a lid pouch and two front balance pockets of about 6 li each. This overcomes some of the limitations of a single main compartment by making more of the load readily accessible in the balance pockets, but still needed to be packed from scratch in the morning. I don't think it is as durable as Deuter, and the more robust Osprey packs, and I had to do some running repairs when my wife walked the CF with it, and again this year.
I used an Atmos 50 on my Caminos! I loved the pack for the comfort and having room where I didn’t have to compress everything or jigsaw puzzle the pieces inside. And the extra room was awesome on grocery days. I also did a winter Camiño so needed extra room for down jacket and heavier sleeping bag.I am currently on the camino Frances and am carrying an Atmos 50 by Osprey. It was the only pack which fit my long torso and it rides extremely well. Its heavy at almost 4 pounds, but I only carry a load of 11 pounds in it. The first thing you should always consider is proper sizing. And trust me, the folks at REI wont always have the right pack for you, so you need to do your own homework. Get a pack that fits first and formost, then pack it to the lightest weight you want. Remember also that water weighs 1 kg per litre. Starting out by buying the lightest, techy-est backpack is the wrong way to start. Get comfortable, pack with discipline. Your body will thank you.
Buen camino.
Over 3 minutes to roll a tee-shirt is crazy, but I suppose it was a demo. I have just checked my times. A long sleeved knit shirt took 27 secs, a long sleeved trekking shirt took 42 secs. I expect anyone doing this everyday will get much better times than that.Seems like way too much work to me, but I am pretty lazy by nature.
Not to be nit-picky here, but why would you compare a 48 L pack with a 28 L pack? That’s kind of apples and oranges. Osprey makes seven 28 L optics - why not compare that to the ultralight?Greetings,
I have done the Camino twice (French Way) and used my trusty Osprey Exos 48. It has served me well.
I'm doing the French Way again in a few weeks, and I have decided to go ultra-lightweight and found a great new pack that doesn't get any buzz on this forum.
Now, don't get me wrong, my trusty Osprey Exos 48 has been a reliable partner, no doubt. But this Rab Aeon Ultra 28L? It blows the competition away when it comes to shedding those extra ounces/grams.
View attachment 147359View attachment 147360
MORE details here: LINKY
The Rab Aeon Ultra 28L weighs just 25 ounces (710g)! Here is a quick comparison:
Osprey Exos 48L Rab Aeon Ultra 28L Capacity 48 Liters 28 Liters Weight (oz/grams) 46/1315 25/710 Dimensions (inches/cm) 31.5H x 14.17W x 11.8D
80H x 36W x 30D21.3H x 13.4 W x 12.2D
54H x 34W x 31D
I have done about 10 practice hikes with the Rab (up to 15 miles/25km), and here are my observations:
Rab is based in the UK, and very few stores in the US have Rab packs. I think they are more available in Europe.
- POSITIVES:
- Really lightweight!
- Decent hip belt (given the weight of the pack)
- I love all the pockets on the shoulder straps (4 total) Very handy for phones, small cameras, snacks...
- There are 2 nice hip-belt pockets that are stretchy and functional
- Very large and very functional side water bottle pockets that are actually easy to use and reach!
- A very large and stretchy outside back pocket (great for raingear, food...)
- Very good comfort with 17 pounds/7.7kg (which is my dry pack weight)
- Waterproof (and all the seams have been taped)
- Meets carry-on regulation size, so I will not need to check my backpack! NOTE: My pack fully loaded is just under 9" deep/22.9cm, so it meets the regulations.
- NEGATIVES:
- It is only 28 liters. It's tight, but I can get all my stuff in the pack.
- Durability? It is made from lightweight materials, but I think it should hold up.
- Ventilation is not as good as my Osprey (who have the best), but still very good.
- Not as comfortable as my Osprey, but still very good.
Might want to check out the pack for your next Camino.
I will do a full report when I return.
Hope you find this helpful!!!!
Cheers,
Sorry for the typos: it should say;Not to be nit-picky here, but why would you compare a 48 L pack with a 28 L pack? That’s kind of apples and oranges. Osprey makes seven 28 L optics - why not compare that to the ultralight?
https://www.google.com/aclk?sa=l&ai...u-6xroT_AhVgVKQEHSrrDrYQwg8oAHoECAEQDA&adurl=
https://www.google.com/search?q=osprey%2028%20litre%20backpack&tbm=
Osprey makes several 28 L options…
which model of vagabond are you using? the packable?the Rab looks like a nice pack. It’s wonderful to have another carryon legal pack with a hip belt that does load transfer than weights under 2lb. Love to hear how it works for you.
I will second the gossamer gear g4 / gorilla / kimo for people wanting more volume with loads less than 25lb. I wouldn’t worry about durability. My Gorilla has several thousand miles of back country backpacking and is still in good shape. I know people who have nearly 10k miles on their gossamer gear packs and other companies than use robic fabric.
My wife and I are on the Frances route right now. We trimmed down enough that we don’t need a hip strap for load transfer. She is at 6lb/13L, I am at 7lb/14l. She will likely switch backpacks for our next trip. I am using and loving the gossamer vagabond. It has been just about perfect!
Only downside is regularly having to say “yes that’s all we have. No, our bags are not being transferred”.
I highly doubt it. Forum members often mention gear that they've found that they feel is good enough to share with the forum.Hi, are you working for this company?
Because it was what I was using (48l) for my first 2 Caminos (when I did a daily blog and had to carry a laptop, charger, mouse cables, camera...).Not to be nit-picky here, but why would you compare a 48 L pack with a 28 L pack? That’s kind of apples and oranges. Osprey makes seven 28 L optics - why not compare that to the ultralight?
https://www.google.com/aclk?sa=l&ai...u-6xroT_AhVgVKQEHSrrDrYQwg8oAHoECAEQDA&adurl=
https://www.google.com/search?q=osprey%2028%20litre%20backpack&tbm=
I'm not sure I understand. I don't unroll any more than I need to wear at a time, so I don't have to re-roll more than I have washed, dried and needs to be packed away. That is generally only four or perhaps five items, not all the items in my pack.like the Ranger Roll system but I can't imagine doing that everyday for each item on Camino.
You know that you can blog with only a phone?Because it was what I was using (48l) for my first 2 Caminos (when I did a daily blog and had to carry a laptop, charger, mouse cables, camera...).
Because it was what I was using (48l) for my first 2 Caminos (when I did a daily blog and had to carry a laptop, charger, mouse cables, camera...).
I'm trying a lightweight approach this time and not doing a daily blog... So I don't need 48l, and I am trying 28l.
Plus, I'm finding that with 28l, I'm more conscious of what I'm packing.
Not all ultralight backpacks are created equally. Some are indeed fragile. Others are very durable. Some are indeed small, others are 40L or bigger. What many are lacking is extra pockets and zippers, and they don’t have the same kind of frame the heavier packs have - and you will pay more $$$ for a quality ultralight backpack.I think there are 2 different kinds of backpack:
- The true reliable, strong backpacks, which weigh more than 1 kilo empty
- The light, more fragile backpacks, which weigh as less as 700 or 800 g. These ones offer often less than 40L capacity.
His photos are the centrepiece of his blogging so this probably means he won't be bringing his camera gear and laptop to process images. Check out his blogs, he takes incredible photos.You know that you can blog with only a phone?
I am 79 and everything is wrinkled anyway. So the wrinkled clothes are part of my look.Seems like way too much work to me, but I am pretty lazy by nature.
Great Post. Osprey Stratos 36L for me.Greetings,
I have done the Camino twice (French Way) and used my trusty Osprey Exos 48. It has served me well.
I'm doing the French Way again in a few weeks, and I have decided to go ultra-lightweight and found a great new pack that doesn't get any buzz on this forum.
Now, don't get me wrong, my trusty Osprey Exos 48 has been a reliable partner, no doubt. But this Rab Aeon Ultra 28L? It blows the competition away when it comes to shedding those extra ounces/grams.
View attachment 147359View attachment 147360
MORE details here: LINKY
The Rab Aeon Ultra 28L weighs just 25 ounces (710g)! Here is a quick comparison:
Osprey Exos 48L Rab Aeon Ultra 28L Capacity 48 Liters 28 Liters Weight (oz/grams) 46/1315 25/710 Dimensions (inches/cm) 31.5H x 14.17W x 11.8D
80H x 36W x 30D21.3H x 13.4 W x 12.2D
54H x 34W x 31D
I have done about 10 practice hikes with the Rab (up to 15 miles/25km), and here are my observations:
Rab is based in the UK, and very few stores in the US have Rab packs. I think they are more available in Europe.
- POSITIVES:
- Really lightweight!
- Decent hip belt (given the weight of the pack)
- I love all the pockets on the shoulder straps (4 total) Very handy for phones, small cameras, snacks...
- There are 2 nice hip-belt pockets that are stretchy and functional
- Very large and very functional side water bottle pockets that are actually easy to use and reach!
- A very large and stretchy outside back pocket (great for raingear, food...)
- Very good comfort with 17 pounds/7.7kg (which is my dry pack weight)
- Waterproof (and all the seams have been taped)
- Meets carry-on regulation size, so I will not need to check my backpack! NOTE: My pack fully loaded is just under 9" deep/22.9cm, so it meets the regulations.
- NEGATIVES:
- It is only 28 liters. It's tight, but I can get all my stuff in the pack.
- Durability? It is made from lightweight materials, but I think it should hold up.
- Ventilation is not as good as my Osprey (who have the best), but still very good.
- Not as comfortable as my Osprey, but still very good.
Might want to check out the pack for your next Camino.
I will do a full report when I return.
Hope you find this helpful!!!!
Cheers,
I would have no hesitation using it again. Although UL it is very durable.This was also on my shortlist. How did it hold up for you???
It's great that you think this is (almost) perfect, or have a skill in writing headlines, but I'm not inclined to think this would be on my list of packs to consider anytime soon.
I have used lightweight packs from other makers, and always found them highly compromised. In particular, they remove so much padding from the harness that their comfortable load carrying limits are significantly reduced compared to more traditional designs of similar volumes. Those that I have used were all single compartment designs, although most had a lid. I find single compartment designs less easy to use in albergues, where you want to pack items like a sleeping bag in the bottom of the pack, so packing cannot be even be started until the morning. Two compartment designs generally allow one compartment to be completely packed in the evening, and only those items used during the night can then be packed into the other compartment in the morning.
More, RAB don't seem to make this in a size that would suit me. You already note that you think it will be a squeeze to get everything you need into this pack. My preference is not to have a pack so full that it is difficult to get access to the contents during the day. Certainly sensible loading will ensure that most items one needs during the day are close to the top, but not everything can be, and I would rather not have to unload too much to get at something if it is possible to pack less densely and be able to reach around inside the pack when one needs to.
There are plenty of good packs out there that don't "get any buzz on this forum". I actually think that's a good thing. Promoting particular products, as you have done here, runs the risk of being seen as trying to influence members towards a particular solution. Perhaps your views on this will be more valuable once you have used it on the camino and have a better appreciation of how well it actually performs in that environment.
I was going to take the packable, but at the last minute I switched to the trail model. From 10oz to 18oz and we’ll worth it. The shoulder strap padding makes a big difference after multiple 30k days.which model of vagabond are you using? the packable?
Hi! I used this like you for my last Camino but reverted to folding clothes and putting them into a dry bag!I utilized the "Ranger Roll" technique to fold and repack my clothes, and the results were astounding. I was amazed at how much space I was able to recover using this method. It seems like I gained an additional 10-15% of space! Now, I'm no longer worried about fitting everything in.
The side pockets have an opening on the side (might be hard to see in the photos) and are very easy to access and the material is very stretchy.Does not look like a perfect pack for me, but as many others have said, thats down to personal preference. If it works for you, great.
- Rather heavy for its size
- Side pockets are rather high, getting to your stuff there will be complicated without taking off the pack
- Shoulder strap pockets are rather small, likely to small to fit a water bottle --> this combined with the last point is a serious downside for me
- No extra attachment points (e.g. daisy chain ) on the shoulder straps --> see last two points
- fixed hipbelt. Might fit your back length, might not.
- not exactly sure how water resistant the not so clearly specified material is exactly. Might be a minor point.
- not exactly sure how big the pocket on the front of the pack is. Might be a little small to be practical, but might be a minor point.
So yeah, if those things are of no issue, it might be a viable pack. For me, it's far from perfect and i would use something like a Kumo instead.
How is the ventilation on your G4??? I sweat like pigHi! I used this like you for my last Camino but reverted to folding clothes and putting them into a dry bag!
The Ranger rolled clothes for me (only my opinion) felt like a had a pack of hard lumps instead of a quite soft pad of clothes!
My pack is also a Gossamer Gear G4-20 ready for the Frances; i wear it every day at home for shopping, my daily 5-7 mile dog walk etc! It is minimal and light (weight mine is the large and weighs 750grms including the fitted seat pad) Accessible water bottle holder you can reach on the move and a brilliant stretch front pocket that is again accessible on the move if your even a little flexible and so capacious if needed.
I don't think i will ever look for another it's a keeper!!!
Woody
Hi JJinWI!How is the ventilation on your G4??? I sweat like pigso ventilation is important to me. My Osprey does a great job of keeping my back dry. This new Rab has some ventilation, but not nearly as good as the Osprey.
Thanks!
@JJinWI - have you looked at Zpacks backpacks? Larger volume and expensive, but very lightweight with an adjustable trampoline style back for air flow.
They used to be less expensive...They look like great packs... but YIKES!!!! $400!!!!!
Thanks for the info!!!!
Cheers,
Welcome to the ultra-light! I'm using a 22l pack this time, because I just couldn't fit into a 7l pack, no matter how hard I've triedYes, picking a Camino backpack (like much of life) is full of comprises.
Balancing weight vs comfort vs size vs cost vs...
My first 2 Caminos (with my Osprey & blogging equipment) weighed a lot.
So, I thought it would be fun/interesting to try an ultra-lightweight approach to this Camino.
Hi I have a 50 litre Aura Osprey backpack and was wondering if you put your 50 litre backpack as carry on luggage. Would love a reply.I used an Atmos 50 on my Caminos! I loved the pack for the comfort and having room where I didn’t have to compress everything or jigsaw puzzle the pieces inside. And the extra room was awesome on grocery days. I also did a winter Camiño so needed extra room for down jacket and heavier sleeping bag.
I’ve just returned home and I’m already planning my next Camiño. I looked at other pilgrims jealously with their 30L packs and I’m researching lighter options. Just between my sleeping bag and empty pack weight I could easily shave 4 pounds. Which sounds very appealing…. But my next Camiño will be another winter one so I’m not sure it will be worth it to lose the four pounds and lose the comfort, security and ease of use I have?
I need to think on this
Whether or not someone else was able to carry on a 50 liter backpack does not guarantee that you will be able to. Each airline has their own limits as far as size and weight, and it depends on if the backpack is stuffed full or can be squished down to fit into the luggage sizer. Some have rigid frames that keep you from being able to get them into the sizer.Hi I have a 50 litre Aura Osprey backpack and was wondering if you put your 50 litre backpack as carry on luggage. Would love a reply.
As @trecile advises, what someone else has gotten away with does not guarantee that you will. Most airlines have a maximum carry on length of around 55/ 56 cm - some are even smaller. I believe the Aura is around 75/80cm long? Makes it very unlikely!Hi I have a 50 litre Aura Osprey backpack and was wondering if you put your 50 litre backpack as carry on luggage. Would love a reply.
JJ, did you ever do this report? If so, I can’t locate it. Options are always good to have!I will do a full report when I return.
I had no issues with my Osprey Stratos 36L on Emirates, Air New Zealand or Ryanair. A tight squeeze but no problems.As @trecile advises, what someone else has gotten away with does not guarantee that you will. Most airlines have a maximum carry on length of around 55/ 56 cm - some are even smaller. I believe the Aura is around 75/80cm long? Makes it very unlikely!
There are multiple recent threads on the forum expressing how strictly the airlines are currently enforcing this, with only a few people saying they had no issues. Many of whom last walked years ago. It’s your risk, I certainly wouldn’t plan on taking it as carry on.
By the way, I know it’s an excellent pack, but it’s a pretty large/heavy pack for the Camino. Are you carrying camping gear too, or a lot of camera equipment? Downsizing to a 32l could save you half a kilogram or more, and mean you have an excellent chance of finding one that fit’s your airlines carry on requirements IF that’s an option for you. It’s only a thought, we all walk our own Camino!
Buen Camino
VERY interesting! how did it go?Greetings,
I have done the Camino twice (French Way) and used my trusty Osprey Exos 48. It has served me well.
I'm doing the French Way again in a few weeks, and I have decided to go ultra-lightweight and found a great new pack that doesn't get any buzz on this forum.
Now, don't get me wrong, my trusty Osprey Exos 48 has been a reliable partner, no doubt. But this Rab Aeon Ultra 28L? It blows the competition away when it comes to shedding those extra ounces/grams.
View attachment 147359View attachment 147360
MORE details here: LINKY
The Rab Aeon Ultra 28L weighs just 25 ounces (710g)! Here is a quick comparison:
Osprey Exos 48L Rab Aeon Ultra 28L Capacity 48 Liters 28 Liters Weight (oz/grams) 46/1315 25/710 Dimensions (inches/cm) 31.5H x 14.17W x 11.8D
80H x 36W x 30D21.3H x 13.4 W x 12.2D
54H x 34W x 31D
I have done about 10 practice hikes with the Rab (up to 15 miles/25km), and here are my observations:
Rab is based in the UK, and very few stores in the US have Rab packs. I think they are more available in Europe.
- POSITIVES:
- Really lightweight!
- Decent hip belt (given the weight of the pack)
- I love all the pockets on the shoulder straps (4 total) Very handy for phones, small cameras, snacks...
- There are 2 nice hip-belt pockets that are stretchy and functional
- Very large and very functional side water bottle pockets that are actually easy to use and reach!
- A very large and stretchy outside back pocket (great for raingear, food...)
- Very good comfort with 17 pounds/7.7kg (which is my dry pack weight)
- Waterproof (and all the seams have been taped)
- Meets carry-on regulation size, so I will not need to check my backpack! NOTE: My pack fully loaded is just under 9" deep/22.9cm, so it meets the regulations.
- NEGATIVES:
- It is only 28 liters. It's tight, but I can get all my stuff in the pack.
- Durability? It is made from lightweight materials, but I think it should hold up.
- Ventilation is not as good as my Osprey (who have the best), but still very good.
- Not as comfortable as my Osprey, but still very good.
Might want to check out the pack for your next Camino.
I will do a full report when I return.
Hope you find this helpful!!!!
Cheers,
I would greatly appreciate a packing list from your good lady wife as I plan my fourth Camino. I started with 17 lbs in 2002 (no "Gossamer Gear" options then: it was a Kelty something or other) and in 2012 and 2018, I had still not learned my "less weight in the pack"lesson. I moved from Missouri to Portugal last summer so US-brand options are an expensive option. Thank you!the Rab looks like a nice pack. It’s wonderful to have another carryon legal pack with a hip belt that does load transfer than weights under 2lb. Love to hear how it works for you.
I will second the gossamer gear g4 / gorilla / kimo for people wanting more volume with loads less than 25lb. I wouldn’t worry about durability. My Gorilla has several thousand miles of back country backpacking and is still in good shape. I know people who have nearly 10k miles on their gossamer gear packs and other companies than use robic fabric.
My wife and I are on the Frances route right now. We trimmed down enough that we don’t need a hip strap for load transfer. She is at 6lb/13L, I am at 7lb/14l. She will likely switch backpacks for our next trip. I am using and loving the gossamer vagabond. It has been just about perfect!
Only downside is regularly having to say “yes that’s all we have. No, our bags are not being transferred”.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?